Tonight was the first real night of the RNC, and what an awesome night it was.  From Mrs. Laura Bush to my favorite Fred Thompson – the speeches were filled with facts, with tangible, concrete information and were in direct opposition to any speech made during the DNC as far as being filled with content rather than empty rhetoric.  

However, the evening ended with Sen. Lieberman (who let’s not forget actually won the popular vote in 2000 as the VP running mate to Gore) whole heartedly endorsing McCain (again).  There is not enough time to run through all the quotes of the evening, however this one should speak to every American tonight: 

Eloquence is no substitute for a record.

Lest we forget that we are voting for the leader of the free world and not for the winner of an Oscar, take a real honest look at who the true bipartisan leader is, who has the record of helping all Americans, and who’s character is truly tested and proved.  

McCain and Palin in 2008 is my vote without any reservation, any hesitation and in a spirit of exuberance that this is the best candidate to lead our country.

If you want a country that is safe, has smaller government, spends less on wasteful pet projects and truly looks out for the greater good of our country – there is no other vote than John McCain.  

Just a Fred Thompson put it, “Our allies trust him and our enemies fear him.”

I read an article (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26448597/) that makes me wonder how stupid the media thinks we are.  In this article, it is pointed out that Obama issued his acceptance speech of the Democratic Presidential Nominee on the 45th anniversary to the day of the I Have a Dream speech… “by happenstance”.

Call me a skeptic, call me a conspiracy whisperer or call me paranoid… but does the Obama campaign, the Democratic party and the press (especially MSNBC who should just release an all out endorsement of Obama and officially deny air-time to McCain) really expect that the American people will not add the “happenstance” to a growing list of contrived actions by this party?  This has been planned since Obama gave the keynote address at the DNC in 2004.  This was carefully orchestrated.  Don’t get me wrong, being in advertising and marketing, I get that a promotion has to make sense… but this is what I call an overtly pressed message!

Line the date up with the forced speech by Ms. Clinton, her quite obviously mandated part in the roll call process for delegate counts, and President Clinton’s speech and you have an epoch script that the Democrats have written to try and band-aid their party.  It’s obvious to me that any genuine or “authentic” aura around the Obama campaign should be gone, at least to any discerning spectator.  

Don’t get me wrong, I know politics are politics no matter what side of the fence you’re on, but this was laughable.  These guys are as good at acting as Burt Reynolds.  

Let’s see how the Maverick and Reformer fare in the RNC, the Gallup pole and in head to head with their respective opponents in debates – without tele-prompters!

You must see this website (Audacity of Deception and Hypocrisy) before you vote in this years election for our next President.  For anyone who thinks that Barak Obama has an ounce of decency, morality, integrity or pro-life bent… look at the records, the videos and hear the testimonials. 

 

How tragic if our country chooses a leader that so obviously supports infanticide.

“Some people grow under responsibility, other merely swell.”

Carl Hubbell

Today we redefine everything in Christendom to the point that we have to define the word “Literal”.  One would think that of all words, that word would need not be redefined, defined or speculated on.  Perhaps next we’ll redefine “Definition” so that all religions everywhere will speak the same lingo and be unified – yet mean completely different things when they speak.

Far fetched?  Don’t think so.  All we have to do is look at the difference currently in the Mormon, Catholic and “Reformed” (just one of the terms that seems to be getting muddy) Christianity.  The same terms are used such as Salvation, Christ, Sin, Heaven and Hope but the meanings are vastly different from one another.  Truths never change and neither do definitions.  Reformed doctrine teaches those truths and the corresponding accurate definitions.

The “Modern Gospel” is akin to this statement of Democrats by Ronald Reagan, “You can never underestimate the ability of Democrats to wet their finger and hold it to the wind.”  As we round the corner into the next era, we must be careful to not adjust our theology to whichever way society is blowing us.  Truth is truth, has been truth and will always be truth.  Stand up and be strong – the Lord is on our side and His truth will prevail!

“The Democrats seem to be basically nicer people, but they have demonstrated time and again that they have the management skills of celery.”

Dave Barry

“I believe that pluralistic secularism, in the long run, is a more deadly poison than straightforward persecution.”

Francis Schaeffer 

Politics is one of my interests.  The debates, the strategies and in past years Tim Russert, his white board and Super Bowl excitement have always been fun for me to watch.

This year is very different for me.  You see late time we voted for a president I was (of course) four years younger (21 that is) and had just had my first child.  It was ever present in my mind that a my choice for candidate had to be pro-life.  

This year is much different for me.  I’ve added two additions to my clan and have come to increasingly value the unborn, the mothers considering abortion and the fathers that desperately wish for their children to live and not be cast out.  While I’ve always been against abortion in theory, I’ve never been as enraged about this battle as I am this year.

For this post, I want to focus on the flaw in thinking that a vote for the candidate who is pro social justice, environmental protection, against any war, etc… but supports abortion and a women’s right to choose is a responsible, educated, rational or somehow ubber philosophical decision that only the most learned of scholars could truly understand as being somehow pro-life.  

The premise is this, Obama (let’s get this clear right off the bat) has very pro-life stance because of his position on universal health care (which by the way, if you think things are bad now, wait and see what happens if UHC would actually come to pass), his stance on environmental issues and overall tone of ending war and protection of the poor.  However, he very clearly is a liberal as they come on issues related to a women’s right to choose – aka the murder of millions of babies through doctor assisted homicide.

The argument is Utilitarian.  The greatest good of this candidate will be offset their flaws. 

The rebuttal is this, the foundation of all sanctity of life discussions has to first be brought back to why the discussion of social justice, ending war, environmental protection, etc… is even important in the first place.  The reason is this, because human lives and their quality of life matter (I will never disagree with that statement).  So then, we now need to define human life.  Human life is separated from the rest of the animal kingdom by two things; the ability to reason and an created (thus having a beginning), everlasting soul.  The often quoted verse of the Bible, Jeremiah 1:5 states “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed yo a prophet to the nations.”  If a baby or fetus were to not have a soul or meaning until it was a certain age of gestation, what is that line and how can we define it.  If it is the magical push through the birth canal that finally gives a baby purpose, what is so magical about that ride that creates the meaning.  If it is the second trimester, why?  Because all of the Read More »

Too often today, the 18 to 25 year old group is standing for issues out of rebellion, a lack of discernment and more often than not, a root of pride and discontentment.  We fail to remember that what we gain in zest, we lack in experience.  We’re greenhorns charging full steam ahead through could-be-guided territory and have asked the guides to stay put and by the way, keep the maps… we can do this all over again, better than you have the past couple thousand or so years!

When I hear the rumblings of how we have to change church, Christianity and the way in which we as believers engage the culture around us, I have to wonder why.  If I remember correctly, we’re commanded to stand firm and hold fast to the gospel.  The world hated Christ, how can we possibly be better than He, such that the world would treat us different?  Have we perfected the great commission beyond what the Great Shepherd lived out?

What has happened today is the gospel according to Sun Tzu has crept into the church, weaving its way into orthodox circles cloaked under the guise of societal retooling.  Sun Tzu in “The Art of War” lays out strategies; some say for war, others say for management, still others say for negotiations.  In any case, the phrase that has continually stuck with me is “Maintain a position of no apparent position.”  In other words, to avoid being pinned down by an adversary, never reveal your rooted position.  If your “position” cannot be determined, there is no way to attack, thus your opponent is continually on the run.  This however has one great flaw – exhaustion.  You can surmise that if your position can never be determined, you and your enemy will always be on the run, thus your war, battle, negotiation, etc… will never be completed and are truly fruitless.  Rather it will render you and your enemy blithering, exhausted, most likely paranoid, idiots.

You can tell who holds to this Gospel by trying to find out exactly what they hold to.  They’re evasive, they want to redefine nuances of the scripture and most importantly, they feel that culture demands how we interpret scripture.  A person with these characteristics will never stand firm on the hard issues because they’re too concerned with how the world will see them as unloving, dogmatic, too political, etc….

Therefore, under the Gospel According to Sun Tzu, we’ll focus on liberty, yet forget about God’s moral law.  We’ll parade for saving the trees while we elect officers of the nation who openly vote for the slaughter of unborn children.  We’ll fight for social injustices, yet forget that “The Son of man came to seek and save the lost.” (Luke 19:10)  We’ll focus on healing the injustices of the world around yet and disregard the fact that mans lost souls will never allow for true justice to reign.

Slippery is best word to describe these “neo-theologians”.  They want all the buzz words to be true about them and their ministry.  They want authenticity so bad that they advertise it, market it and tell you their authentic thus precluding them from being so.  They want community but fail to build that on solid teaching, which is what ultimately builds common bonds.  They want to be missional but forget that the mission is preaching and teaching the word, in season and out.  They are tickling the ears of a weak, naïve generation and care more about being cool, hip people that have a Christian faith rather than a Christian who happens be able to relate to those around them because of their love.

“Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong.  Let all that you do, be done in love.”  1 Cor. 16:13-14.  We’re told to first stand firm in the faith, to be strong and do all of it in love (love by the way, is doing right in God’s perspective, not ours).  Not a syrupy love to the point of being weak and rendering ourselves (or all Christians) emasculated. 

To my generation who is dipping toes into the “new” Christianity that is emerging and is seeking to redefine what it means to be a believer, wake up.  Truth can never be redefined, fads, movements and trends change, God’s word remains true.  If you’re going to hitch your wagon to something that can change to world, make sure it is truly, the undiminished Truth and not a societal wind blowing undiscerning, noisy bible “scholars”.

“What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun.”  Ecclesiastes 1:9

“A people that values its privileges above its principles soon looses both.”  

Dwight D. Eisenhower

 

Are we there yet?